Health is on the chopping block (in the US and worldwide). Federal funding cuts. Global health funding cuts. Jobs being lost. Health being drastically impacted. It has been a rough few weeks for many of you - and that's to say the least. ​(read this newsletter on our website)​ PerspectiveThere is a lot of damage that is happening right now. Funding freezes, confusion, and no clarity on the long-term impact of these cuts are creating uncertainty for global health workers, public health workers, researchers, and the communities that rely most on these services. The scale of these cuts is historic - affecting both domestic and global health programs. From layoffs at the CDC and NIH to halted funding for HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention programs in Africa - these decisions jeopardize millions of lives. Congress' Role and the Need for AdvocacyCongress plays a critical role in determining funding levels for public health and global health programs. In addition to setting budget allocations, Congress also establishes policy provisions and restrictions that:
These funding decisions directly impact life-saving programs, and advocacy is crucial right now. Policymakers must hear from public health professionals, researchers, and affected communities to protect the infrastructure that supports millions of people in the U.S. and beyond. (📢 Join advocacy efforts with the National Alliance of Public Health Students and Alums) Federal impactThousands of public health jobs have been cut, leaving many professionals unemployed. The impact on domestic health programs is profound: MedicaidRepublican leaders have proposed reducing federal Medicaid funding by $1.5 to $2 trillion, introducing stricter work requirements and lifetime benefit caps. Their proposal also eliminates the 90% federal match rate for the Affordable Care Act expansion. These proposals could end health coverage for 20 millions Americans. These changes could have huge impacts for low-income communities who already face significant health inequities. RFK Jr.’s Impact on NIH and Federal Health PolicyRobert F. Kennedy Jr., the new U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, has positioned himself as an opponent of traditional public health policies, particularly in vaccines and federal research funding. If he gains more political influence, we could see:
National Institutes of Health (NIH)The NIH has faced a suspension of grant funding, freezing much of its $47 billion budget. This is happening despite multiple lawsuits challenging the executive order. The meeting freeze has stalled about 16,000 grant applications,delaying an estimated $1.5 billion in funding for critical research. New policies have capped indirect research costs at 15% (down from 30%-70%), putting research institutions at financial risk, leading to widespread layoffs and halted research projects. Additionally, these cuts could discourage young scientist from entering the field and push existing experts to leave the U.S., further weakening the U.S. research landscape. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)A proposed $1.8 billion cut, approximately 22% of the CDC’s budget, is under consideration. Major public health coalitions, including the Big Cities Health Coalition, have pushed back against these cuts. This reduction threatens essential programs, including the potential elimination of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, which addresses suicide and overdose prevention. Public health emergency response capabilities would be significantly weakened, and these cuts may discourage professionals from pursuing careers at the CDC. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)Significant job cuts are underway. Reports indicate that as many as 5,200 probationary employees across HHS could be dismissed. These cuts affect various agencies under HHS, including the CDC, NIH, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and could undermine public health programs and threaten emergency response efforts. HHS Secretary Kennedy has suggested shifting the agency's focus away from infectious diseases and instead prioritize chronic disease and lifestyle health interventions - a shift that could weaken the nation's pandemic preparedness. Global Impact (Lens on AIDS)The U.S. has historically been the largest single donor to global health programs - funding initiatives related to HIV/AIDS, malaria, maternal health, and emergency response. <0.1% of the U.S. Federal budget - $12.4 billion - goes to global health. While this may seem small, these funds are critical for community-based organizations that fight some of the world’s toughest health challenges. However, recent USAID and global health budget cuts have already caused major disruptions. HIV/AIDS and PEPFAR Funding at Risk
(📖 Read: "My Wife Fears Sex, I Fear Death" – a powerful story on how USAID cuts impact HIV patients worldwide.) USAID and International Humanitarian Assistance
(📖 Read: Other projects that have already been affected by aids cuts) How Foreign Aid Cuts Affect the World's PoorestThe U.S. is the largest global health donor, funding HIV/AIDS treatment, maternal and child health, tuberculosis, malaria, nutrition, and more. Cuts to these programs could worsen global health crises and increase preventable deaths. Programs at Risk
Without U.S. funding, we face:
With less than 0.1% of the U.S. budget supporting global health, these cuts could undo decades of progress and cost millions of lives. Will these organizations recover?Given the economic downturn, global inflation, and weakened donor commitments, many of these organizations may struggle to fully recover - even if funding is restored in the future.
The damage to research infrastructure and international collaboration efforts could take years—if not decades—to repair. Looking AheadIt seems pretty bleak right now, but this is the work we signed up for. Achieving health equity was already hard—and now it’s even harder. That just means we have to step up even more—to advocate, organize, and push back. We must continue to protect the most vulnerable and marginalized populations, not just in the U.S., but worldwide. ConclusionThe federal budget cuts to domestic health agencies and international aid programs have created severe public health and humanitarian consequences. The CDC, NIH, Medicaid, and USAID are all experiencing historic reductions in funding, endangering both U.S. public health and global health security. With millions of lives at stake, experts warn that the repercussions of these cuts could reverse decades of progress in disease prevention, healthcare access, and humanitarian aid—with long-term consequences that may be difficult, if not impossible, to undo. Final Thought:Take care of yourself. Support your community. Be kind. Stay resilient. And allow the serendipity to flow your way. ​ [share this with someone that would get value from it: https://thephmillennial.com/signup/] Paid Coaching CallsI empower public health professionals to gain career clarity with actionable support—from refining resumes and LinkedIn strategies to optimizing job searches, negotiations, and financial planning. Only a few spots remain for February—book your session now: [https://calendly.com/thephmillennial/coachingcall]. ​ Join Free CommunityJoin our free public health community: [https://thephmillennial.com/join-the-community/] If you have any questions, just click the relevant link or reply to this email—I’d love to hear from you. 💡 Have a topic you’d like me to cover? [Submit here] Take care, Omari ​ Omari Richins, MPH (he/him)
Founder, The Public Health Millennial
Follow on all platforms: ​ |
Helping public health people navigate career success. Helping you learn, navigate, and transform your public health career with valuable insights. Host of Public Health Careers Podcast 🎧
Lately, I’ve been taking a more intentional approach to how I engage with media. It’s easy to get caught up in the constant stream of news, but I’ve realized that detaching from it and choosing when and how I engage has helped me stay focused on what really matters. With all the shifts happening in public health, I want this community to be a space where we grow, support each other, and take meaningful action—without feeling overwhelmed. With that in mind, here are a few exciting updates: 🎙...
We knew that change was inevitable. Recent executive orders by President Trump spark discussions about the future of public health (and health). Not all of these polices may ultimately be implemented or survive legal challenges. However, they offer a clear window into the administration's priorities and intent. From changes to health care access to the banning of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. These actions signal a shift in public health that could reshape health care,...
Public health has increased US life expectancy (by 25 years since 1900). Public health is a cheat-code for making everyone healthier. After years of wanting to be a physician, I came across a field of work that impacts the upstream factor of health - at a population level. That field is public health. Public health is important because it: Improves the health of populations Addresses root causes of health issues Focuses on prevention of disease rather treatment (Join early access waitlist for...